Latest News

Join CWU Now
Retrieving results...
Advertisement

Door-to-door direct mail

0Latest update

  • Figures for the past 12 months show a rise in unadressed mail volumes from 28 billion to 3.2bn - up 14 per cent. And projections for the coming year predict a further 16 per cent increase - up to 3.7bn.
  • The growth of this activity is protecting jobs and counterbalancing decline in some other areas providing further proof that this was very much the right step to take.

July 2011: Postal newsletter: general update on issues including ColleagueShare, World Class Mail, pensions, the London mail centre dispute and key policies agreed at this year's annual conference.

Background

Last year's Business Transformation - 2010 and Beyond agreement altered the arrangements for delivery of direct mail, unadressed mail, or "door-to-door" work by:

  • Removing the cap of three items per week by bringing this into normal workload.
  • Introducing a standard, across the board £20 per week payment for all as opposed to payment on a "per-item" basis meaning the payment system is now fair and equal for all. It is worth noting that all of the monies paid out to delivery workers under the "door-to-door" system are now used to fund the flat rate £20 payment to all. Royal Mail has not made any financial savings from this payment system change.
  • Allowing adequate "prep" time and incorporating this work as part of a normal workload. If any of you experience problems over this, then please contact your unit rep, or contact us here at CWU HQ.
  • The changes mean that more of this work can come into delivery in the future, existing jobs can be protected and, hopefully, new jobs can be created.
  • A few more years of "no change" would have meant continued unfairness, no door-to-door work at all and no extra money for anyone and Royal Mail eventually losing this activity altogether.
  • This issue was the one which sparked more debate than any other during negotiations between Royal Mail and the union. There were a lot of people who opposed this change, but the overwhelming Yes vote in the national ballot showed that it was supported by the vast majority of members.

For more information please feel free to contact us.